|
It seems that Taleban are my main preoccupation. But to be honest, it
is Afghanistan that concerns me most. After all who can ever forget
the land of his forefathers, the playground of his childhood? The war-torn
land has not seen peace in over twenty years. Every day there
is new trouble, new problems, and new quagmires that what is left of the
nation of 18 million is facing.
At first it was the Russians, our so-called neighbors and "friends."
It is well known what the Soviets did to us. We lost almost two
million martyrs as a result of the Russian atrocities. We lost millions
more as refugees, most of them to find returning well-nigh impossible.
The various groups began struggles for superiority over the others and,
in the process, brought about death and destruction to the masses, the
poor, devastated, and powerless people peasants. When they did not kill
people, they destroyed farms, homes and national property and government
establishments. Kabul and Kabulis received the brunt of such brutality.
Next came a leader who had promised to lay the groundwork for an all-encompassing
democratic government that would bring peace and prosperity to Afghanistan
inside a period of six months first, then, in a year's time, and then
decided that the seat of authority was too close to his heart than peace
and tranquility to the people. Some of the country's neighbors talked
of a desire for peace, but deep down, they, too, had their own goals which
they followed diligently. They still do so to this date. A period of highway robbery, and mini-feudal warlords followed which
further aggravated the situation and made life in Afghanistan miserable
for what was left of the nation.
Taleban appeared and seemed to be determined to stop brigandage, collect
arms and thereby bring some measure of tranquility. Unfortunately
this too does not seem to bring about what the nation so direly needs,
time to mend their mental and material wounds and look forward to a
semblance of
normalcy.
Taleban came with a brand of religious intolerance. They stated
outright that what was happening in the country was contrary to Islam.
They termed such things as men shaving their beards or wearing suits instead
of shirts and trousers to work, or caps over their heads instead
of turbans as grave crimes against Islam.
They called women going out to work as teachers, doctors, office workers
and factory personnel without an all-covering outfit known as burqa a
crime against Islam. They termed girls' schools un-Islamic and banned
them all over the land they occupied and are vying to do the same in the
rest of the country. Not only that, they also stopped boy's schools
beyond a basic knowledge of reading the Holy Qur'an and elementary math
and some writing. Modern education was considered not necessary
for the citizens of the
Ameerate of Afghanistan "and not the Kingdom or the Republic of Afghanistan."
In this, they followed the path of the leaders of Mujahedeen, i. e., to
grab hold of the seat of government in Afghanistan for all time and keep
the land and the people under their brand of rule. Talk
to them about government according to the choice of the Muslim peoples
of Afghanistan, and create a parliamentary system and run the country
according to the expressed and agreed-upon wish of the nation, and see
it fall upon deaf ears.
I wonder if they know how they are planning to run the country and its
government. What financial resources can they rely upon and how
much they expect would be needed year after year to keep everything running
in an orderly way?
If they were thinking that Pakistan or any other country would continue
to help them indefinitely, they are gravely mistaken. Right now
the country is suffering a grave shortage of wheat and flour, the staple
food item of the country. What is Pakistan doing to help the Afghans?
Nothing. They forbid export of any food items to Afghanistan to
let the United States know that they are following their and United Nations
sanctions against Taleban. Just yesterday Pakistan announced that
they had imprisoned some 200 mostly Afghan nationals accusing them of
possible acts of terrorism against American personnel in Pakistan.
Is there anyone who does not know that there are almost a million Afghan
nationals still in Pakistan today who cannot return to their homes because
of the threat of war that seems to never stop in Afghanistan and the impossibility
of the world at large accepting them as refugees until peace can come
to Afghanistan? Just how many more will Pakistan imprison by false
accusations?
Would Iran, the other neighbor, take steps to help Taleban who are in
command of about 90% of Afghanistan? A few days ago they allowed
a small quantity of food items to reach Herat. Then just a day or
two afterwards Iran publicly announced that its stand against Taleban
has not changed. Taleban are playing host to Ossama bin Laden
because he helped Afghanistan during the war against the Soviets and because
he now apparently has taken refuge in the country against elements that
are his enemies. In so far as this is in accordance with the spirit
of Afghan hospitality and in line with their principle of Pukhtanwali,
it is all well and praiseworthy. But is it fair to put a whole nation
in grave danger by holding on to a "friend" who finally has
come to his senses and has suggested that he is ready to leave Afghanistan
and go to some secret spot elsewhere on earth? Was that an honest
promise or just a ruse perpetrated by Mr. Bin Laden? Is it fair
for Taleban to continue to keep Ossama in the country when a super power
like the United States has openly warned Afghanistan that she would hold
Afghanistan and Taleban totally responsible for any act of terrorism that
takes place anywhere in the world where U.S. interests and American lives
are threatened.
Just the other day an Algerian was caught in a remote Port of entry into
the United States from neighboring Canada with enough nitroglycerine and
other bomb-making materials to completely annihilate a four-block business
and residential area in any American city. The United States intelligence
agencies immediately related the man, Ahmad Ressam, to bin
Laden. Prior to that the United States media announced that a group
of 14 "terrorists" were caught in Jordan who were all trained
in Afghanistan. What would have happened to Afghans in remote Afghanistan,
if Ressam and/or his band had actually been able to carry out their act
of terrorism and blasted their bomb killing innumerable innocent people?
I believe the first reaction would take the form of bombarding the already
devastated country of the Afghans for something that, in the eyes of the
world , was the work of bin Laden and his clique of sworn enemies of the
United States. And it is not certain that any retaliatory measure
would reach the person of bin Laden, the accused culprit.
When will Taleban put a stop to the further demolition of what may still
be intact in the infrastructure of Afghanistan? The destruction
already wrought, by the Russians and mostly by Afghans themselves, must
be measured in billions of dollars. I see no funds of any kind in
the Afghan treasury to rebuild what we lost. How much more are we
willing to lose by the futile stubbornness of Taleban in the matter of
bin Laden?
Is there any way to make Taleban see and understand the consequences
of their act? Will they realize the gravity of the situation by
themselves? Any time soon?
I, for one, most earnestly hope so
|